|


Tuesday
17th April 2007

Jacqui Dean’s bill to prohibit legal party pills will result
in an increase in Illegal drug use and abuse of alcohol, according
to research by respected market research organisation Consumer
Link.
Download
research here
“Legal party pills are an established part of the New Zealand
social scene and you can’t pretend that you can just ban
them without generating a reaction,” said STANZ chair Matt
Bowden. “The nature of that reaction should be a key factor
in the Government’s decision-making yet the Government has
not even tried to evaluate the likely result, and this Bill aims
to completely undermine the consultation process Jim Anderton has
initiated and the entire evidence based system we have in New Zealand.
Mrs. Dean had claimed that BZP party pills were responsible for
an increase in “stupid crimes” in the town of Oamaru.
“Legal party pills are nowhere near as dangerous as some
people are making them out to be. They don’t increase serious
crime, and they are not associated with aggressive behaviour or
sexual assault.”
Consumer Link interviewed 200 New Zealanders aged between 18 and
29. Of the respondents 89 per cent drank alcohol, 41 per
cent had used legal party pills and 54 per cent had used illegal
drugs. This profile is consistent with the results of a Massey
University study last year.
Key findings are:
- Legal party pills are
not a route to harder drugs: Of those surveyed who used illegal drugs,
95.6 per cent answered “no” when asked if legal party
pills had been a gateway.
- Legal party pills tend to reduce
rather than promote other drug and alcohol use: Among
the legal party pill users, a net 10.3 per cent reported taking
less or no illegal drugs as a result and a net 9.8 per cent
less or no alcohol.
- Banning
legal party pills will lead to higher alcohol and illegal drug
use: A
net 30.5 per cent of party pill users believe that consumption
of alcohol will increase and a net 50 per cent that illegal
drug use will increase if BZP is banned. *To
get an idea of how much more traffic this may generate for
the illegal drug market, it should be remembered that 50,000
legal party pills are sold in New Zealand each week.
- The
adverse effects from legal party pills are far less severe
than for alcohol: Of the sample
subset who had used both; 81.7 per cent reported suffering
headaches as a result of alcohol consumption compared to 29.3
per cent from legal party pills while for vomiting the incidence
was 74.4 per cent and 17.1 per cent respectively; memory loss;
59.8 per cent and 8.5 per cent; physical injury, 45 per cent
and 7 per cent and aggression toward others, 28 per cent and
1.2 per cent.
- Legal party pills are non-addictive
and much easier to control: 27.5
per cent of alcohol users described their drinking as either
sometimes, often or always out of control and 18 per cent
thought it would be “quite difficult” to
quit, 7.3 per cent “very difficult” and 2.2 per
cent “impossible”. The corresponding figures
for legal party pill users were 3.6 per cent and 1.2 per cent.
No-one thought giving up would be either “very
difficult” or “impossible.”
“The results overwhelmingly reinforce our strongly held
view that tougher regulations are the answer rather than prohibition
or even the status quo, where the restrictions on the sale of party
pills are few and where the consumer is provided with little protection
under the law.
“STANZ has instructed professional public lawyers to draft
a comprehensive set of regulations supported by a detailed code
of manufacturing practice. We have put a lot of effort into
cleaning up the industry and it would be extremely irresponsible
for the Government to ignore this work, and the findings of the
Consumer Link survey,” Matt Bowden said.
Note: Commissioned by the Social Tonics Association of New Zealand,
the survey results are available on STANZ website at http://www.stanz.org.nz/
Contact: Matt Bowden, 021-77-23-23

 |
STANZ
offers full safety code for party pills.
STANZ Press Release 11 Feb 2007. |
| |
|

|
PROPOSED RESTRICTED SUBSTANCE REGULATIONS
STANZ has instructed Public Law Specialists, Chen Palmer,
to draft Restricted Substances Regulations for submission
to the Associate Minister of Health, Hon Jim Anderton,
as he considers whether to reclassify BZP and related piperazines
as a Class C drug or to retain as a Restricted Substance. |
| |
|
 |
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR RESTRICTED SUBSTANCES
The Code of Practice for Restricted
Substances is a voluntary code for any business or person
that imports, manufactures, stores, distributes or sells
any restricted substance .It covers Sale and Supply, Dosage,
Labelling etc. The
Code and the GMP are in addition to the requirements of the
Misuse of Drugs Amendment Act and have been established to
further the harm reduction objectives of the Act. It includes
the Code of Good Manufacturing Practice for Restricted Substances
which is modelled on the New Zealand Code of Good Manufacturing
Practice for medicinal Products. |
| |
|
 |
CODE OF GOOD
MANUFACTURING PRACTICE FOR RESTRICTED SUBSTANCES (“GMP”)
The GMP works with the Code of Practice, it covers manufacturing
standards etc. |
Join STANZ mailing list here!
To contact STANZ, please write to mail@stanz.org.nz
|